主文每一句「条文见附录 A」都在这里找得到条文号、原文句、链接和标签。标签栏抄的是主文已经定下的判断，这里不重新判一遍——只给判断背后那一行出处，方便回查，也方便交给律所的合伙人或合规负责人看原文。三档标签的意思见 → 通用版 0.4 合规句的三档标签与停笔规则。律所版另有两条挂法：律师公会 Council 的执业指引（PD）和指引说明（GN）是监管方白纸黑字，算「条文明文」，但原文用「should」「advisable」「good practice」的句子照引，并写明它是建议；一件事现行条文没有禁止、我们据此照做的，标「未取到原文」，后面一律跟固定句「现行条文未见禁止（核对范围：…；核对日：2026-09-29）」——对客户只说「我们没找到禁止它的条文」，不说「法规允许」。
读了什么、没读到什么（核对日 2026-09-29）：
- 读到了：SSO 上 PCR、律师法、三部附属规则、FJA、CYPA 的逐条页。命令行直连 SSO 一律被网站防火墙挡回验证页，这一轮用真实浏览器过了验证再逐条取文，版本取自每部法的时间线，页面均显示「Current version as at 29 Sep 2026」。律师公会伦理页上的 12 份 PD 与 2 份 GN，从原链接重新下载，逐字比对，落款日期逐份核过。SAL 专长认证的现行页、营销指南与家事法认证文件：SAL 官网有人机验证，这一轮用真实浏览器取到了现行版，存档副本只用来对照改版。律师公会的 Featured 名录页、Practice Excellence Awards 页和 LSRA 的律师与律所查询页，2026-09-29 当天读。另有已撤销的 Publicity Rules 全文、Law Gazette 2012 年 8 月那篇网上宣传指引、律师公会的伦理资源说明页。
- 没读到：律师公会会员区里 Advisory Committee 自 2015 年起出的 100 多份书面伦理指引，和 2019、2020 两本 Ethics Digest——下载链接返回登录页；律师公会付费名录的刊例条款——原页 404；以及 A.6 末尾「没取到的原文」表里的其余各项。会员区这批文件可能有针对网站收费页或客户评价的个案裁定，是判侧把握度（75%）的主要余量：第一家律所客户开工前，请客户律所用会员账号把它们导出来，这是开工清单里的一步。
出处链接（下表 URL 栏只写简称加逐条页后缀 ?ProvIds=prN-，拼到对应的地址后面即可）：PCR 即《Legal Profession (Professional Conduct) Rules 2015》（S 706/2015）sso.agc.gov.sg/SL/LPA1966-S706-2015，现行版 04 May 2022（Amended by S 334/2022）；律师法 LPA 即《Legal Profession Act 1966》sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/LPA1966，现行版 17 Apr 2025（Amended by Act 37 of 2023）；LPE Rules 即《Legal Profession (Law Practice Entities) Rules 2015》（S 699/2015）sso.agc.gov.sg/SL/LPA1966-S699-2015，现行版 11 Oct 2024（Amended by S 776/2024）；RI Rules 即《Legal Profession (Regulated Individuals) Rules 2015》（S 701/2015）sso.agc.gov.sg/SL/LPA1966-S701-2015，现行版 11 Oct 2024（Amended by S 777/2024）；CFA Regulations 即《Legal Profession (Conditional Fee Agreement) Regulations 2022》（S 333/2022）sso.agc.gov.sg/SL/LPA1966-S333-2022，04 May 2022，未修订；FJA 即《Family Justice Act 2014》sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/FJA2014，现行版 15 Oct 2024；CYPA 即《Children and Young Persons Act 1993》sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/CYPA1993，as at 29 Sep 2026（s 112 的 (1A) 注 wef 15/10/2024）。律师公会的 PD、GN 列在 A.3 开头；已撤销的《Legal Profession (Publicity) Rules》（R 13，2010 RevEd）sso.agc.gov.sg/SL-Rev/161-R13/Published/20100531?DocDate=20100531，已被 PCR r 51(b) 撤销，只作沿革对照。
A.1 PCR 2015：宣传、保密、收费、头衔
这一节要你做的：主文挂的是 PCR 条号时，按条号来这张表核原文句、链接和标签；核完直接用，不在这里重新判断这条禁令成不成立。标签里写「未取到原文」加固定句的，是现行条文没禁、我们照做的事，对客户不说成法规允许。
PCR 是 Professional Conduct Council 依律师法 s 71(2) 订的执业操守规则。宣传规则集中在第 5 部分（r 37–49），另有 r 6 保密、r 17–19 收费、r 33 头衔。第 5 部分管的是律师和律所，不管我们：我们替律所写、替律所发的每一条，都由律师当作自己的宣传负责（r 42(1)）；我们自己要担的刑责在律师法和家事法条里，见 A.2、A.4。
| 条文号 | 原文句 | URL | 标签 | 用在哪一节 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| r 2(1)「publicity」 | 「“publicity” means any form of advertisement, and includes any advertisement that —(a) is printed or contained in any medium for the communication of information; or (b) appears in, or is communicated through or retrievable from, any mass medium (electronic or otherwise) or the Internet, and “publicise”, “publicised” and “publicising” are to be construed accordingly;」GN 6.1.1 第 30 段同样写明：「Publicity conducted through the Internet is subject to Part 5 of the PCR 2015」 | PCR ?ProvIds=pr2- | 条文明文 | 0.2、2.4、3.4 |
| r 3(7) 第 5 部分管谁 | 「Part 5 applies —(a) to the following legal practitioners: (i) every solicitor who has in force a practising certificate or is registered under section 36F of the Act; (ii) every person admitted under section 15 of the Act; (iii) every foreign lawyer who is registered under section 36B of the Act; (b) to every Singapore law practice; and (c) to the following law practices, in connection with the practice of Singapore law: (i) every Joint Law Venture; (ii) every Formal Law Alliance; (iii) every Qualifying Foreign Law Practice; (iv) every licensed foreign law practice.」注：(a)(i) 后半句引的律师法 s 36F 已废止（SSO：「36F. [Repealed by Act 22 of 2018]」），「registered under section 36F」这一半现为空；前半句持有效执业证的律师照样在内 | PCR ?ProvIds=pr3- | 条文明文 | 0.2 |
| r 6(2)、6(3)(a) 保密与客户授权 | 「(2) … a legal practitioner must not knowingly disclose any information which —(a) is confidential to his or her client; and (b) is acquired by the legal practitioner … in the course of the legal practitioner’s engagement. (3) A legal practitioner may disclose any information referred to in paragraph (2), if —(a) the client referred to in paragraph (2) authorises the disclosure;」 | PCR ?ProvIds=pr6- | 条文明文；「确认某人是本所客户」本身属保密信息：保守线，非条文明文（把握度 80%） | 1.4、1.5、5.15、6.5、B.2 |
| r 15A(2)(b) 劝和义务 | 「from the time those proceedings are contemplated, and whenever it is reasonably possible, advise the client to consider resolving those proceedings amicably; and」 | PCR ?ProvIds=pr15A- | 条文明文（对客户的执业义务，不是宣传条款）；家事内容不写「打到底」「让对方付出代价」一类渲染对抗的文案：保守线，非条文明文（把握度 65%） | 1.7、5.7 |
| r 17(3)、r 18、r 18A 收费告知、风险代理与 CFA 例外 | r 17(3)：「A legal practitioner must —(a) inform his or her client of the basis on which fees for professional services will be charged, and of the manner in which those fees and disbursements (if any) are to be paid by the client; (b) inform the client of any other reasonably foreseeable payments that the client may have to make, either to the legal practitioner or to any other party, and of the stages at which those payments are likely to be required; …」（(c)(d) 另规定应客户要求给估价、实收不得大幅偏离估价）。r 18：「A legal practitioner or law practice must not enter into any negotiations with a client …—(a) for an interest in the subject matter of litigation or of any other contentious proceedings; or (b) except to the extent permitted by any applicable scale of costs, for remuneration proportionate to the amount which may be recovered by the client in the proceedings.」r 18A（S 334/2022，wef 04/05/2022）：「(1) Rules 17 and 18 do not prevent a legal practitioner or law practice from doing either or both of the following: (a) entering into negotiations for, or entering into, a conditional fee agreement that complies with Part 8A of the Act; …」 | PCR ?ProvIds=pr17-、pr18-、pr18A- | 条文明文（r 17(3) 是委托时对客户的告知义务，落点是委托书，不是宣传条款；只能说明「区间 + 计费方式」与律师的义务方向一致） | 1.2、5.20 |
| r 19 不与非律师分律师费 | 「(1) A legal practitioner must not share the legal practitioner’s fees with, or pay a commission to, any unauthorised person for any legal work performed by the legal practitioner. (2) A law practice must not share its fees with, or pay a commission to, any unauthorised person for any legal work performed by the law practice.」注：我们是 r 2(1) 意义上的 unauthorised person；任何按律师费百分比、按案件分成的营销服务费，律所一方即违规 | PCR ?ProvIds=pr19- | 条文明文 | 0.2、6.1、6.2 |
| r 32 监督员工 | 「A legal practitioner must, regardless of the legal practitioner’s designation in a law practice, exercise proper supervision over the staff working under the legal practitioner in the law practice.」 | PCR ?ProvIds=pr32- | 条文明文 | 6.1 |
| r 33(1)–(4) 头衔白名单 | r 33(1)：「A legal practitioner who is an advocate and solicitor must not describe himself or herself in connection with his or her profession as anything other than —(a) an advocate and solicitor; (b) a lawyer; (c) a legal consultant (if qualified to be one); (d) a Commissioner for Oaths (if appointed as one); (e) a Notary Public (if appointed as one); or (f) such other description as may be approved by the Council from time to time.」r 33(2)–(4)：外国律师只能称「a foreign lawyer」「a legal consultant (if qualified to be one)」或 Council 批准的描述；「Paragraph (1) does not prevent a Senior Counsel appointed under section 30 of the Act from describing himself or herself … as a Senior Counsel.」 | PCR ?ProvIds=pr33- | 条文明文；「Divorce Specialist」「Family Law Expert」当头衔（名字下方、名片、名录头衔栏）：保守线，非条文明文（把握度 75%） | 1.6、3.2 |
| r 37 尊严 | 「A legal practitioner must not engage in publicity, or procure any work or engagement for himself or herself, the law practice in which he or she practises or any other person, in circumstances which affect the dignity and standing of the legal profession.」 | PCR ?ProvIds=pr37- | 条文明文 | 1.1 |
| r 39(1)、39(2)(b) 招揽与引荐对价 | r 39(1)：「A legal practitioner or law practice must not tout for business or do anything which is likely to lead to a reasonable inference that the thing was done for the purpose of touting.」（「tout」PCR 未定义）。r 39(2)：「Without prejudice to the generality of paragraph (1), where there is reason to believe that a client is referred to a legal practitioner or law practice by any other person, the legal practitioner or law practice — … (b) must not reward the referror by the payment of any commission or other form of consideration;」（同款另有 (a)(c)–(g)：保持独立、不让引荐影响意见、直接与客户确认指示等） | PCR ?ProvIds=pr39- | 条文明文（禁的不止佣金，任何形式的对价都算）；按固定费参加转介或匹配平台也算「other form of consideration」：保守线，非条文明文（把握度 80%） | 5.6、6.1、6.2 |
| r 40(1)(c) 房产过户转介协议 | 「any publicity of the referror (whether written or otherwise), which refers to any service that may be provided by the legal practitioner or law practice, must not suggest any of the following: (i) that the conveyancing service is free; (ii) that different charges are payable for the conveyancing service, depending on whether the client instructs the legal practitioner or law practice; (iii) …」只管房产过户转介；PD 7.4.3 D.2 把同一套要求延伸到车祸与人身伤害转介（见 A.3） | PCR ?ProvIds=pr40- | 条文明文 | 6.2 |
| r 41 宣传本所 | 「Subject to these Rules, a legal practitioner may —(a) publicise the legal practitioner’s practice, or the practice of a law practice of which the legal practitioner is a director, a partner or an employee; or (b) allow the employees of the law practice to do so.」注：(b) 只许律所自己的员工替律所宣传，不是外部代理代发的依据 | PCR ?ProvIds=pr41- | 条文明文 | 0.2、6.1 |
| r 42(1)–(4) 替你发的也算你的；纠正；撤下；徽章 | r 42(1)：「A legal practitioner must ensure that any publicity relating to the legal practitioner’s practice complies with these Rules, whether that publicity is by the legal practitioner or by any other person on the legal practitioner’s behalf.」r 42(2)：「Where a legal practitioner becomes aware of any impropriety in any publicity relating to the legal practitioner’s practice …, the legal practitioner must use the legal practitioner’s best endeavours to procure the rectification or withdrawal of the publicity, and to prevent the recurrence of the impropriety.」（省略处的完整主语是「the legal practitioner’s practice or the practice of a law practice of which the legal practitioner is a director or a partner」：纠正义务只落在本人和律所的董事、合伙人身上，不含受雇律师）。r 42(3)：「Where the Council determines that any publicity relating to the practice of a legal practitioner or law practice is contrary to any provision of these Rules, the Council may order the legal practitioner or law practice to alter, withdraw, remove or discontinue the publicity or cause the publicity to be altered, withdrawn, removed or discontinued.」r 42(4)：「A legal practitioner or law practice must ensure that any publicity relating to the practice of the legal practitioner or law practice does not make use of the armorial bearings of the Society.」 | PCR ?ProvIds=pr42- | 条文明文；替律所代发：未取到原文——现行条文未见禁止（核对范围：PCR 全文；核对日：2026-09-29），把握度 85%，依据是 r 42(1) 原文预设了由「any other person on the legal practitioner’s behalf」发布的情形；r 42(2) 套到第三方自发的名录、榜单条目：保守线，非条文明文（把握度 65%） | 0.2、1.1、3.4、6.1 |
| r 43(1)(a)、43(2) 专长有据、七项依据 | r 43(1)(a)：「When a legal practitioner publicises the legal practitioner’s practice or the practice of a law practice of which the legal practitioner is a director, a partner or an employee, the legal practitioner must ensure that —(a) any claim to expertise or specialisation can be justified;」r 43(2)：「For the purposes of paragraph (1)(a), the following factors may be taken into account in justifying any claim to expertise or specialisation: (a) academic qualifications; (b) experience; (c) proportion of working time involved; (d) level of success achieved; (e) complexity of law and practice; (f) significance of the matters involving the legal practitioner or the law practice …; (g) assessment by peers.」 | PCR ?ProvIds=pr43- | 条文明文 | 1.6、3.2、3.3、5.22、B.4 |
| r 43(1)(b)(i)(ii) 过往案件、成功率 | 「(b) the publicity does not make any direct or indirect mention of —(i) any past case in which, or any client for whom, the legal practitioner, the law practice or any member of the law practice had acted, if the provision of any such information will result in a breach of any duty of confidentiality owed to a client or former client of the legal practitioner or law practice; or (ii) the success rate of the legal practitioner, the law practice or any member of the law practice;」 | PCR ?ProvIds=pr43- | 条文明文（成功率一项原文没有任何例外） | 1.4、5.8、5.15、5.21、6.4 |
| r 43(1)(c) 不比同行的收费与质量 | 「(c) the publicity does not make any comparison or criticism in relation to the fees charged, or the quality of the services provided, by any other legal practitioner or law practice.」 | PCR ?ProvIds=pr43- | 条文明文（和同行比收费或服务质量：点名的、能认出是哪一家的、和本所价同表或同段出现的，都在这句里，「最便宜」「比同行低」「市场价 X，我们 Y」也算）；不点名的市场区间单独一句、旁边没有本所价，同样不写：保守线，非条文明文（把握度 85%，原文「any other」不要求点名）；自称 No.1、top、best：保守线，非条文明文（把握度 80%，依据是本条的隐含质量比较加 r 44(2)(c) 不可核） | 0.2、1.3、1.6、5.4、5.5、5.7、5.8、5.11 |
| r 43(3) 升任法官的前律师 | 「any publicity relating to the law practice must not refer to the legal practitioner’s appointment to the judiciary during the tenure of the legal practitioner’s judicial office;」（名字作为律所名一部分出现不受限） | PCR ?ProvIds=pr43- | 条文明文 | 1.4 |
| r 43(4) 不许招揽 | 「These Rules do not permit the doing of anything which may reasonably be regarded as touting by —(a) a legal practitioner; (b) a law practice; or (c) a director, a partner or an employee of a law practice.」 | PCR ?ProvIds=pr43- | 条文明文 | 6.4 |
| r 44(1)(a)(b)(c) 误导、尊严、Council 认定不宜 | 「A legal practitioner must not publicise … in a manner which —(a) is likely to diminish public confidence in the legal profession or to otherwise bring the legal profession into disrepute; (b) may reasonably be regarded as being misleading, deceptive, inaccurate, false or unbefitting the dignity of the legal profession; or (c) the Council may determine to be an undesirable manner of publicising the practice of a legal practitioner or law practice.」 | PCR ?ProvIds=pr44- | 条文明文；折扣、限时、促销腔与醒目的价目海报：保守线，非条文明文（把握度 60%） | 1.1、1.2 |
| r 44(2)(a)–(d) 什么叫误导 | 「For the purpose of these Rules, publicity is misleading, deceptive, inaccurate or false if —(a) it contains a material misrepresentation; (b) it omits to state a material fact; (c) it contains any information which cannot be verified; or (d) it is likely to create an unjustified expectation about the results that can be achieved by the legal practitioner or the law practice …」 | PCR ?ProvIds=pr44- | 条文明文 | 1.2、1.4、1.6、5.4、5.5、5.6、5.7 |
| r 45(1)(2) 赞助致谢只出名字 | 律师可以捐赠、赞助、提供免费服务，受助方可公开致谢；律师「must take reasonable steps to ensure」致谢「does not state any information pertaining to the legal practitioner or law practice except —(a) in the case of a contribution made by a legal practitioner, the legal practitioner’s name, the fact that the legal practitioner is a legal practitioner, and the name of the law practice …; and (b) in the case of a contribution made by a law practice, the name of the law practice.」 | PCR ?ProvIds=pr45- | 条文明文（义务是「采取合理步骤确保」，不是结果保证） | 5.20 |
| r 46 第三方宣传里带上律所 | 「Subject to the Act and these Rules —(a) a legal practitioner may allow the legal practitioner’s practice or the practice of the law practice of which the legal practitioner is a director, a partner or an employee; and (b) a law practice may allow its practice, to be publicised in, or in conjunction with, the publicity of any third party, whether or not the party is a client of the legal practitioner or law practice.」注：本条管第三方在自己的宣传里带上律所，不是「代理以律所名义发」的依据 | PCR ?ProvIds=pr46- | 条文明文 | 6.3 |
| r 47(2)(3) 义务法律咨询 | 在法律援助点做义务咨询时，只可公开姓名、律师身份与律所名；律师不得「(a) distribute any of the legal practitioner’s business cards or any brochure, leaflet or pamphlet …; or (b) act for any person to whom the legal practitioner has given such free legal advice, unless the legal practitioner acts for that person in a pro bono capacity.」 | PCR ?ProvIds=pr47- | 条文明文 | 5.20 |
| r 48、r 49 宣传在哪算发生 | r 48：「(1) A legal practitioner may publicise … in a country other than Singapore, and where the legal practitioner does so, rules 43 to 47 do not apply. (2) … the legal practitioner must ensure that the publicity is not conducted in a manner that is contrary to the laws of that country.」r 49：「(a) publicity is conducted in a jurisdiction in which the publicity is reasonably expected to be received or accessible in the normal course of events; and (b) publicity is not conducted in a jurisdiction if the receipt of the publicity in the jurisdiction is incidental.」 | PCR ?ProvIds=pr48-、pr49- | 条文明文；中文页在新加坡正常可以访问，仍属新加坡宣传，r 43–47 照样适用：保守线，非条文明文（把握度 85%） | 5.3 |
A.2 律师法（LPA 1966）与附属规则：执业、名称、中介罪、罚则、风险代理
这一节要你做的：查执业资格、律所名称与后缀、我们自己会犯的中介罪、纪律罚则和「no win no fee」时，来这张表核原文句和链接。s 33 那三行管的是我们自己，不是律师：报价、合同和我们自己的营销材料动笔前先对一遍。
我们自己会犯的罪，律师法里有两处：s 33(3) 收费替人安排律师服务、s 33(1)(b) 暗示自己能执业（下表）；家事法条里还有 CYPA s 112(5)(b) 与 FJA s 10(5)（A.4）。其中 s 33(3) 直接管我们怎么收钱：我们对律所客户只收固定服务费，不按线索、按案件、按签约客户数或律师费比例收——按那几种方式收，我们可能犯 s 33(3)；律所一方按律师费比例或按案件分成付，违反 PCR r 19，按线索、按签约客户数付，落进 r 39(2)(b)；我们自己的销售与营销材料里，不写「our legal team」，也不写我们提供「free legal consultation」。
| 条文号 | 原文句 | URL | 标签 | 用在哪一节 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| s 30(1)、(6) Senior Counsel | 「A Selection Committee comprising the Chief Justice, the Attorney‑General and the Justices of the Court of Appeal may appoint an advocate and solicitor … as Senior Counsel if the Selection Committee is of the opinion that, by virtue of the person’s ability, standing at the Bar or special knowledge or experience in law, he or she is deserving of such distinction.」s 30(6)：须累计满 10 年（中文转述，这 10 年由哪些资历累计，本轮没有逐字摘出） | LPA ?ProvIds=pr30- | 条文明文 | 1.6、3.2 |
| s 32(1) 执业资格 | 「a person must not practise as an advocate and solicitor or do any act as an advocate and solicitor unless —(a) his or her name is on the roll of advocates and solicitors; and (b) he or she has in force a practising certificate.」（原文以「Subject to this Part and Part 4A,」开头） | LPA ?ProvIds=pr32- | 条文明文 | 0.2 |
| s 33(1)(b) 非律师暗示能执业 | 「wilfully or falsely pretends to be, or takes or uses any name, title, addition or description implying that he or she is duly qualified or authorised to act as an advocate or a solicitor, or that he or she is recognised by law as so qualified or authorised,」罚则：「a fine not exceeding $25,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6 months or to both」，再犯最高 S$50,000 或 12 个月 | LPA ?ProvIds=pr33- | 条文明文（罪状与罚则）；「our legal team」「free legal consultation by us」一类措辞落入本条：保守线，非条文明文（把握度 75%） | 0.4、6.1 |
| s 33(3)(4)(5) 收费替人安排律师服务 | 「(3) Any unauthorised person who, for or in expectation of any fee, gain or reward, offers or agrees to place at the disposal of any other person the services of an advocate and solicitor shall be guilty of an offence.」(4)：「Subsection (3) does not apply to any person who offers or agrees to place at the disposal of any other person the services of an advocate and solicitor pursuant to a lawful contract of indemnity or insurance.」「(5) Every person who is convicted of an offence under subsection (2) or (3) shall be liable for a first offence to a fine not exceeding $10,000 or in default of payment to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 months and for a second or subsequent offence to a fine not exceeding $25,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 6 months or to both.」 | LPA ?ProvIds=pr33- | 条文明文；固定月费的代运营不构成「place at the disposal」：未取到原文——现行条文未见禁止（核对范围：LPA s 33 全条；核对日：2026-09-29），把握度 70%，未见判例或指引确认 | 0.2、6.1 |
| s 33(6)(7)(7A)(8) 公司、董事、员工、合伙人另罚 | 「(6) Any act done by a body corporate which in the case of a person would be an offence under subsection (1), (2) or (3) … shall be an offence and the body corporate shall be liable on conviction for a first offence to a fine not exceeding $25,000 and for a second or subsequent offence to a fine not exceeding $50,000. (7) Where an act mentioned in subsection (6) is done by a director, an officer or an employee of the body corporate, the director, officer or employee shall (without affecting the liability of the body corporate) be liable to the punishments provided in subsection (5).」(7A)：LLP 的合伙人、高级职员、员工同样另罚（中文转述）。(8)：「Where any firm does an act which in the case of a person would be an offence under subsection (1), (2) or (3), every member of the firm is deemed to have committed that offence unless he or she proves that he or she was unaware of the commission of the act.」 | LPA ?ProvIds=pr33- | 条文明文 | 6.1 |
| s 71(7)(9) PD 的效力 | s 71(7)：PCR 优先于「any practice directions, guidance notes and rulings (relating to professional practice, etiquette, conduct and discipline) issued by the Council or the Society」；s 71(9)：这些文件「continue in force until they are revoked」。另：PCR r 44(1)(c) 禁止「the Council may determine to be an undesirable manner of publicising」的宣传方式，PD 6.2.2 B 就是援引这一项下的结论（原文见 A.1、A.3） | LPA ?ProvIds=pr71- | 条文明文 | 0.2、1.1 |
| s 75D Consultant 要满 10 年 | 「a solicitor must not take or use the title of consultant unless he or she has, for a period of not less than 10 years in the aggregate, been —(a) a solicitor in practice; …」「(2) Any solicitor who contravenes subsection (1) shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $10,000.」 | LPA ?ProvIds=pr75D- | 条文明文 | 1.6 |
| s 78(1)(e) 不得雇用掮客名单上的人 | 律师不得雇用家事法庭掮客名单（FJA s 39，见 A.4）上的人，也不得给其报酬——中文转述：条文已对 SSO 核过，本轮没有逐字摘出原句 | LPA ?ProvIds=pr78- | 条文明文（引原句前补取） | 1.7 |
| s 83(1)、(2)(b)(d)(e)(f)、(7) 纪律罚则与豁免 | s 83(1)：「All advocates and solicitors are subject to the control of the Supreme Court and shall be liable on due cause shown —(a) to be struck off the roll of advocates and solicitors; (b) to be suspended from practice for a period not exceeding 5 years; (c) to pay a penalty of not more than $100,000; (d) to be censured; or (e) to suffer the punishment referred to in paragraph (c) in addition to the punishment referred to in paragraph (b) or (d).」事由含 s 83(2)(b)(i)：违反依 s 71 所定规则、达到不当执业（中文转述）。s 83(2)：「(d) has tendered or given or consented to retention, out of any fee payable to him or her for his or her services, of any gratification for having procured the employment in any legal business of himself or herself, of any other advocate and solicitor …; (e) has, directly or indirectly, procured or attempted to procure the employment of himself or herself, of any advocate and solicitor … through or by the instruction of any person to whom any remuneration for obtaining such employment has been given by him or her or agreed or promised to be so given; (f) has accepted employment in any legal business through a person who has been proclaimed a tout under any written law relating thereto;」s 83(7)：「The Minister may make rules for the exemption from subsection (2)(d) or (e) …」 | LPA ?ProvIds=pr83- | 条文明文（2026-09-29 查 SSO 上律师法现行附属立法全表，没有据 s 83(7) 订的豁免规则，引荐对价没有例外可用） | 0.2、6.2 |
| s 85(1) 投诉 | 「Any complaint of the conduct of a regulated legal practitioner —(a) must be made to the Society in writing; …」(1)(b)(c) 另要求投诉人说明是否已有同一事实的投诉，并附 Council 要求的法定声明（中文转述） | LPA ?ProvIds=pr85- | 条文明文（门槛是书面投诉加法定声明，同行可以投诉） | 0.4 |
| s 88(1)(4)(5) Council 罚款与宪报公告 | Council 可「give him or her a warning, reprimand him or her or order him or her to pay a penalty of not more than $10,000」；罚款或训诫要「publish in the Gazette a notice」，公告「must contain the name of the regulated legal practitioner, the nature of the misconduct committed by him or her and the penalty」 | LPA ?ProvIds=pr88- | 条文明文（登宪报的只有罚款令与训诫，警告不登） | 0.2 |
| s 107(1)(b)、(3AA)；s 115B(1)、(4)(b) 只在胜诉时付费与 CFA | s 107(1)(b)：「A solicitor must not — … (b) enter into any agreement by which he or she is retained or employed to prosecute any suit or action or other contentious proceeding which stipulates for or contemplates payment only in the event of success in that suit, action or proceeding.」s 107(3AA)：「This section does not prevent a solicitor from entering into a conditional fee agreement that complies with Part 8A.」s 115B(1)：「A solicitor, a foreign lawyer or a law practice entity may make with a client a conditional fee agreement in relation to remuneration or costs in prescribed proceedings.」s 115B(4)(b)：「the conditional fee agreement must not provide for the remuneration or costs to be payable as a percentage or proportion of the amount of damages or other amounts awarded to or recovered by the client in any contentious proceedings;」 | LPA ?ProvIds=pr107-、pr115B- | 条文明文 | 1.2 |
| s 131(1)、s 138、s 153 律所发牌与名称核准 | 「A solicitor who wishes to practise on his or her own account, or to have a partnership (not being a limited liability partnership) licensed as a law firm, must apply to the Director of Legal Services for —(a) the issue of a law firm licence to his or her practice or the partnership (as the case may be); and (b) the approval of the name or proposed name of his or her practice or the partnership (as the case may be).」（s 138 对 LLP、s 153 对 LLC 同构，均在律师法第 9A 部分） | LPA ?ProvIds=pr131-、pr138-、pr153- | 条文明文 | 0.2、3.1 |
| s 132(2) 改名须批准 | 「No name of a law firm may be changed without the prior written approval of the Director of Legal Services.」 | LPA ?ProvIds=pr132- | 条文明文 | 3.1 |
| s 139(2)、s 154(4) 有限责任声明 | s 139(2)：「The partners of a limited liability law partnership must ensure that every invoice or official correspondence of the limited liability law partnership bears the statement that it is incorporated with limited liability.」s 154(4) 对 law corporation 同文 | LPA ?ProvIds=pr139-、pr154- | 条文明文（发票与正式函件）；推到网站页脚：保守线，非条文明文（把握度 50%，原文不含宣传） | 3.1、B.2 |
| s 154(3) LLC 后缀 | 「Every law corporation must have either the words “Law Corporation” or the acronym “LLC” as part of its name; and no person, firm or group practice other than a law corporation may have those words or that acronym as part of the name of the person, firm or group practice.」 | LPA ?ProvIds=pr154- | 条文明文 | 1.6、2.4、3.1、5.4 |
| LPE Rules r 6(1)、r 9、r 10 律所名称 | r 6(1)：名称不得「(a) is misleading or detracts from the dignity of the legal profession; (b) is so similar to the name of another law practice entity … as to be likely to be confused …」。r 9：「the name of a law firm must not consist of any acronym or solely of initials」（logo 里可用缩写）。r 10：「(1) Subject to paragraph (2), the name of a law firm must not contain any words which are descriptive of the services provided by, or the areas of practice of, the law firm. (2) The words “A Law Firm” or “Advocates and Solicitors” may appear immediately after the name of a law firm.」（r 10 只管 law firm；LLP、LLC 的 r 15、r 29 没有「不得描述业务」这一条） | LPE ?ProvIds=pr6-、pr9-、pr10- | 条文明文 | 3.1 |
| LPE Rules r 7、r 15(1)、r 29(1) 英文登记，中文名须批准 | r 7：「The name of a law firm must be stated in the English language; but the name may, with the approval in writing of the Director of Legal Services, also be stated in any of the other official languages.」（r 15(1) 对 LLP、r 29(1) 对 LLC 同文） | LPE ?ProvIds=pr7- | 条文明文；中文页、中文商家档案、中文名录条目上的中文所名只用获批的那个，没获批的用英文核准名：保守线，非条文明文（把握度 85%） | 1.6、3.1、5.3 |
| LPE Rules r 8(2) 所名里的人名与执业证一致 | 「The name or part of the name of any existing sole proprietor or existing partner of a law firm which is to constitute the name of the law firm must be in accordance with the name of that sole proprietor or partner that appears in the practising certificate of that sole proprietor or partner at the time of the application under section 131(1) of the Act.」 | LPE ?ProvIds=pr8- | 条文明文 | 3.2 |
| LPE Rules r 43(3)、r 50(1)、r 57(1)、r 59(1) 集团执业字样与外国律所 | r 43(3)：「A Singapore law practice which is not a member of a Singapore group practice must not describe itself as a Singapore group practice.」r 50(1)：排除在「permitted areas of legal practice」之外的包括「(a) constitutional and administrative law; (b) conveyancing; (c) criminal law; (d) family law; (e) succession law …; (f) trust law, in any case where the settlor is an individual; (g) appearing or pleading in any court in Singapore …」。r 57(1)：「A Qualifying Foreign Law Practice must not practise Singapore law except —(a) in the permitted areas of legal practice; and (b) through a solicitor registered under section 36E of the Act, or a foreign lawyer registered under section 36B of the Act …」r 59(1)：「(a) may practise Singapore law only in relation to a relevant agreement; and (b) must not practise Singapore law except through a solicitor registered under section 36E of the Act, or a foreign lawyer registered under section 36B …」（relevant agreement 指仲裁协议或含仲裁协议的协议，r 59(14)） | LPE ?ProvIds=pr43-、pr50-、pr57-、pr59- | 条文明文；外国律所页不得暗示能办新加坡家事、继承、刑事业务：保守线，非条文明文（把握度 85%） | 0.1（范围）、1.7 |
| RI Rules r 11(1)(2) Foreign Law Consultant | r 11(1)：「a foreign lawyer who is a consultant of a Singapore law practice —(a) may take or use the title of foreign law consultant; but (b) must not take or use the title of consultant.」r 11(2)：外国律师当 foreign law consultant 须累计至少 10 年（中文转述） | RI Rules ?ProvIds=pr11- | 条文明文 | 1.6 |
| CFA Regulations 2022 reg 3 可做附条件收费的程序 | 限于：「(a) arbitration proceedings …; (b) proceedings before a court … arising from or out of or in any way connected with any arbitration proceedings …; (c) application for a stay of proceedings …; (d) proceedings for or in connection with the enforcement of an award …; (e) … similar or equivalent … outside Singapore; (f) mediation proceedings arising out of … (a), (b), (d) or (e) …; (g) proceedings commenced in the Singapore International Commercial Court …; (h) appeal proceedings arising from … the Singapore International Commercial Court …; (i) mediation proceedings arising out of the proceedings mentioned in paragraph (g) or (h).」 | CFA Regulations ?ProvIds=pr3- | 条文明文（家事法不在名单里） | 1.2 |
A.3 律师公会 Council 的执业指引（PD）与指引说明（GN）
这一节要你做的：主文挂 PD、GN 编号时，来这张表核原文句和落款日期；原文是建议口径（should、advisable、good practice）的，主文照引时写明「这是 Council 的建议」，不写成禁令。PD 3.11.2 那一行本轮没有摘出原句，补取之前主文只引文件名。
12 份 PD 与 2 份 GN，2026-09-29 从律师公会伦理页 lawsociety.org.sg/ethics-professional-conduct/ 的原链接逐份重新下载，落款日期逐份核过。伦理页第 6 类（Publicity and Media Related Matters）的 PD、GN 就是下表 6.x 那八份，没有别的；也没有任何一份专门讲客户评价、Google 评价、第三方榜单或付费奖项。PD 为什么有约束力：律师法 s 71(7)–(9) 加 PCR r 44(1)(c)（见 A.2），不是 r 38(c)(iv)、r 34(1)(f)(iv)——那两条只管律师兼营的业务和出任高管职位。
PDF 地址（前缀 lawsociety.org.sg/wp-content/uploads/，下表 URL 栏写 PD、GN 编号的都指这里）：PD 6.1.1 2020/03/26.-Media-Comments-and-Internet_Social-Media-Posts-PD-6.1.1.pdf（31 January 2019）；PD 6.1.2 2020/03/60.-Referrals_Hyperlinking-of-Websites-PD-6.1.2.pdf（1 June 2018）；GN 6.1.1 2020/03/121.-Ethics-and-Information-Technology-GN-6.1.1.pdf（1 June 2018）；PD 6.2.1 2020/03/66.-Advertisement-and-Media-Publicity-PD-6.2.1.pdf（1 June 2018）；PD 6.2.2 2020/03/74.-Distribution-of-Flyers-or-Leaflets-PD-6.2.2.pdf（1 June 2018）；PD 6.2.3 2020/03/76.-Identification-of-Legal-Practitioners-or-Law-Practices-PD-6.2.3.pdf（1 June 2018）；PD 6.2.4 2020/03/67.-Publicity-by-Legal-Practitioners-Through-Public-Appearances-and-Contributions-to-Publications-PD-6.2.4.pdf（1 June 2018）；PD 6.2.5 2020/03/110.-Visiting-Cards-Legal-Practitioners-PD-6.2.5.pdf（1 June 2018）；PD 3.5.2 2021/05/69.-Rule-33-of-the-Legal-Profession-Professional-Conduct-Rules-2015-.pdf（02 June 2020）；PD 3.11.2 2020/03/24.-Work-Done-by-an-Unauthorised-Person-PD-3.11.2-1.pdf（1 June 2018）；PD 5.2.1 2020/03/19.-Fee-Arrangements-with-Clients-PD-5.2.1.pdf（31 January 2019）；PD 5.5.1 2020/03/25.-Sharing-of-Fees-Between-Legal-Practitioners-PD-5.5.1.pdf（31 January 2019）；PD 7.4.3 2020/03/35.-Warrant-To-Act-Letter-of-Engagement-and-Referrals-from-Third-Parties-PD-7.4.3.pdf（31 January 2019）；GN 5.6.1 2022/08/Guidance-Note-5.6.1-Conditional-Fee-Agreements.pdf（1 August 2022 起效）。
| 文件与段 | 原文句 | URL | 标签 | 用在哪一节 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PD 6.1.1（31 Jan 2019）社媒与网上发言 | 须遵守「(c) to maintain confidentiality between legal practitioner and client; (d) to comply with the rules of professional conduct and publicity;」以及 (g)「to avoid adverse remarks on the conduct or character of the opposing party.」；不当发言的例子包括「posts and/or comments: (a) in relation to on-going proceedings; (b) about clients, judges, opposing party and/or opposing counsel; (c) which disclose confidential information/personal data …」；末段：「Law practices are also reminded to adhere to standards imposed by the Personal Data Protection Act 2012 …」通篇措辞是「should observe」「good practice」 | PD 6.1.1 | 条文明文（Council 的建议口径）；套到评价回复（不谈客户、不谈案件、不评论对方当事人）：保守线，非条文明文（把握度 85%）；PDPA 原文本轮未查：未取到原文 | 1.5、6.5 |
| PD 6.1.2（1 Jun 2018）网站互链 | 互链「are not prohibited, provided there is no form of financial arrangement between the property agent and the law practice. However, the description of the hyperlink must not mislead viewers by suggesting that the property agent is in a position to give legal advice … or that the viewer has to exclusively use the services of the law practice.」末句：「Otherwise, this may constitute an offence under section 33(1)(b) of the Legal Profession Act (Cap 161, 2009 Rev Ed).」 | PD 6.1.2 | 条文明文 | 6.2 |
| GN 6.1.1（1 Jun 2018）第 11、30、31、33–37 段 | 第 11 段把 r 32 的监督义务用到律所的电邮政策（中文转述）。第 30 段：「Publicity conducted through the Internet is subject to Part 5 of the PCR 2015」。第 31 段：「A law practice’s website can be used as an advertising tool or to provide generic legal information that can be accessed by the general public or clients of the law practice. If legal advice is given, a law practice must realise that it could give rise to attendant obligations and risks in law. A law practice may wish to, therefore, consider appropriate disclaimers.」第 35 段：「There are prohibitions against a law practice rewarding any person for referring work to them. The participation in any Internet referral schemes which requires the law practice to pay a fee or share fees paid for legal services referred would be a breach of the LPA.」第 36 段：「Even if no fees are paid or shared, any participation in an online introduction service or referral service carried out in such a way as to ‘unfairly attract work’ to the law practice would be improper given the terms of section 83(2)(b) and/or section 83(2)(h) of the LPA.」第 37 段：律所之间只因转介就要介绍费，属「brokering」 | GN 6.1.1 | 条文明文；怎样算「unfairly attract work」：保守线，非条文明文（把握度 60%）；纯广告位（按领域陈列、读者自选、不转介、不派单、不按结果收费）按固定刊例付费，不在第 35 段内：未取到原文——现行条文未见禁止（核对范围：GN 6.1.1 第 33–37 段、PCR r 39、PD 6.1.2；核对日：2026-09-29），把握度 70% | 0.2、5.9、6.2 |
| PD 6.2.1（1 Jun 2018）B、C 报刊电视广告与拍摄镜头 | B：「Advertisements through the press or TV, unlike advertisements via the distribution of flyers in public places, would not be touting or be reasonably regarded as touting.」C：据 r 43(4)，律所参与拍摄的镜头里不应露出律所名称，片尾字幕致谢可以（中文转述） | PD 6.2.1 | 条文明文；B 段推到搜索广告与网站也不算招揽：未取到原文——现行条文未见禁止（核对范围：PCR r 39、r 43(4)、PD 6.2.1、PD 6.2.2；核对日：2026-09-29），把握度 80% | 6.4 |
| PD 6.2.1 D 四个误导例 | 引导句：「A TV commercial may be reasonably regarded as misleading if:」四例：「(a) it contains a material misrepresentation (eg, representation that the practice is a leading family law practice when it does not have expertise or experience in family law); (b) it omits to state a material fact (eg, failure to state that the law practice only acts in uncontested divorce matters if the practice has no expertise or experience in contested divorce matters); (c) it contains any information which cannot be verified (eg, only a contact number is given without stating the name of the law practice); or (d) it is likely to create an unjustified expectation … (eg, stating that the law practice will be able to recover party and party costs in a civil matter).」注：(a) 被判误导的是「没有家事专长却自称领先」，不是「leading」一词本身被禁 | PD 6.2.1 | 条文明文（TV 广告）；同样的口径套到网站：保守线，非条文明文（把握度 85%）；「leading」默认不写，有第三方榜单同名档位作据才写：保守线，非条文明文（把握度 70%） | 1.6、3.1 |
| PD 6.2.1 D 价目表与收费细节 | 「A TV commercial is reasonably regarded as unbefitting the dignity of the legal profession under rule 44(1)(b) of the PCR 2015 if it suggests that other law practices overcharge their fees or sets out price lists. However, it is not improper for the commercial to refer generally to fixed fee arrangements to provide peace of mind and meet budgetary concerns.」紧接的第三句：「It is nevertheless advisable that, for proper compliance with rule 17 of the PCR 2015, a legal practitioner’s duty to disclose detailed information relating to fees would be best discharged by personally explaining it to the client as opposed to highlighting it in a brief TV advertisement.」 | PD 6.2.1 | 条文明文（TV 广告的尊严判断）；第三句是 Council 的建议（advisable），不是禁令；套到官网费用页（不做醒目的价目海报，写明以委托书为准）：保守线，非条文明文（把握度 60%） | 1.2 |
| PD 6.2.1 E 免费广告位 | 接受报纸免费广告「is not improper … so long as the law practice ensures that the advertising complies with rules 43 and 44 … In particular, the description of the specialisation of the law practice in the advertisement must be in accordance with rules 43(1)(a) and 43(2)」 | PD 6.2.1 | 条文明文 | 6.4 |
| PD 6.2.2（1 Jun 2018）A、B、C 传单、信箱与只留电话 | A：在公共场所派传单「can be an act which may be reasonably regard as touting under rule 43(4) …」（原文如此）；「Direct, in-person solicitation would also be a breach of rule 39(1) of the PCR 2015.」；同段：「It is also permissible for the law practice to display the flyer and/or its contents on the law practice’s website.」B：向组屋住户派发宣传信与名片「would be a breach of rules 44(1)(a) and 44(1)(c)」。C：「Such publicity is reasonably regarded as being misleading (under rule 44(1)(b) of the PCR 2015 read with rule 44(2)(c) of the PCR 2015) as it contains information that cannot be verified … At the very least, the name of the law practice should be stated in the flyer.」 | PD 6.2.2 | 条文明文（线下派发、信箱投递；C 段只针对只写「Legal Services」加电话的传单，措辞是 should）；套到群发冷邮件、私信潜在当事人：保守线，非条文明文（把握度 75%）；推到每一处宣传都写律所名：保守线，非条文明文（把握度 85%）；「必须是核准名、逐字一致」：保守线，非条文明文（把握度 75%，出自 s 132 与 LPE r 6–10 的名称管制，不是本 PD） | 0.2、3.1、3.4、6.1 |
| PD 6.2.3（1 Jun 2018）A、B 名单与外国律师标注 | A：信笺只列「(a) partners or directors of the law practice; and (b) consultants, foreign lawyers or legal associates employed by the law practice in accordance with Singapore’s legislative and regulatory requirements.」（legal associates 是受雇律师，不是律师助理）。B：在网站、宣传册等材料上列出未在新加坡注册的外国律师时，「The following wording would be the minimum necessary」：「“XYZ, qualified in [name of foreign jurisdiction] to practise [foreign law], not registered as a foreign lawyer practising in Singapore, not regulated by the Law Society of Singapore and not a member of the firm.”」末句：「Contravention of this illustration may reasonably be regarded as being misleading, deceptive, inaccurate or false publicity under rule 44(1) … read with rule 44(2)」 | PD 6.2.3 | 条文明文 | 1.6、3.2 |
| PD 6.2.4（1 Jun 2018）A、B、C 公开露面、讲座与供稿 | A：律师「may be identified by name, the fact that he/she is a legal practitioner, and the name of the law practice … and particulars may be given of any special qualifications or specialised knowledge directly relevant to the subject-matter of the publication or appearance.」B：律所在自己场所办面向公众的讲座并做广告、收入场费「is not improper … However, the law practice must ensure compliance with the PCR 2015 at all times.」C：在非法律刊物答读者问，r 47 不适用，律师可具名，并「may therefore wish to include an appropriately worded disclaimer for the enquirer to seek independent legal advice before acting on any advice」 | PD 6.2.4 | 条文明文（A 段是可以标哪些身份信息的正面列举）；供稿署名不加联系方式、不加「欢迎咨询」：保守线，非条文明文（把握度 70%）；C 段免责声明是建议，不是义务 | 6.4 |
| PD 6.2.5（1 Jun 2018）名片 | 名片可列「(a) name; (b) name of the law practice; (c) address of the law practice; (d) telephone number(s) of the law practice; (e) telephone number(s) of the residence; and (f) academic qualifications.」；「although the name of the law practice may be included on a visiting card, the description of the law practice may not be so included.」 | PD 6.2.5 | 条文明文（名片）；推到名录条目的简介栏：保守线，非条文明文（把握度 50%） | 3.2 |
| PD 3.5.2（02 Jun 2020）r 33 职衔 | Council 批准的职衔共二十个：Sole Proprietor、Partner、Senior Partner、Managing Partner、Founding Partner、Legal Assistant、Associate、Senior Associate、Consultant、Senior Consultant、Counsel、Director、Managing Director、Senior Executive Director、Executive Director、Senior Associate Director、Associate Director、Chairman、Adviser、Senior Adviser；律师法团董事的名片须在职衔后注「advocate and solicitor」（Council 自 12 January 2001 起的裁定）；执行岗位后勤人员名片上的职衔「shall be stated in a manner as not to give the impression that he is a legal practitioner.」 | PD 3.5.2 | 条文明文 | 1.6、3.2 |
| PD 3.11.2（1 Jun 2018）非律师所做的工作 | 本轮只核了文件与落款日期，没有摘出原句 | PD 3.11.2 | 未取到原文（原句待补取；补取前 6.1 只引文件名，不引内容） | —（主文未引，只备查） |
| PD 5.2.1（31 Jan 2019）C 律师费取决于追回讼费 | 这类安排「would render a solicitor in breach of section 107 of the LPA and rule 18 of the Legal Profession (Professional Conduct) Rules 2015 … because the solicitor would have an interest in the subject matter of the litigation」；附注引一宗 2013 年高等法院判例（[2013] SGHC 135）：为经济困难的当事人代理、明知胜诉才可能收到费用，本身不违规（中文转述） | PD 5.2.1 | 条文明文 | 1.2 |
| PD 5.5.1（31 Jan 2019）律师间转介不收介绍费 | 「A mere referral should not result in any costs being demanded or expected by the legal practitioner referring the client to another legal practitioner. This would be tantamount to ‘brokering’ and should not be permitted or condoned.」 | PD 5.5.1 | 条文明文 | 6.2 |
| PD 7.4.3（31 Jan 2019）D.2、E 第三方转介与委托书 | D.2 把 r 40(1)(c) 那套转介要求延伸到车祸与人身伤害转介，并禁律师收转介方的钱，D.2(b)(i)：「accept from the referror the payment of commission, referral fee or any other form of consideration」；D.2(d)(i) 同 r 40(1)(c)(i)，管引荐方宣传「服务免费」（中文转述）。E：建议把 r 17 要求的收费告知写进委托书（中文转述，原句本轮未摘出） | PD 7.4.3 | 条文明文（D.2(b)(i) 原句）；E 段只有转述：引原句前补取 | 5.20、6.2 |
| GN 5.6.1（1 Aug 2022）第 6、11–12 段 CFA | 「CFAs are not Contingency Fee Agreements, which are agreements where practitioners agree to accept an agreed percentage of the sum or damages recovered by a client. … Contingency Fee Agreements continue to be prohibited under Singapore law and should not be entered into.」CFA 的形态包括「(i) “No win, no fee”; and (ii) “No win, less fee.”」 | GN 5.6.1 | 条文明文；家事页写「no win no fee」即误导（宣传一种不能签的安排）：保守线，非条文明文（把握度 85%） | 1.2、5.16 |
A.4 家事专属：不公开审理、儿童身份、劝和、掮客名单
这一节要你做的：家事律所的每一条案例、判例解读、评价转载、评价回复和供稿，动笔前先来这张表核 FJA s 10 与 CYPA s 112。这两条是法条原文，合伙人签字放不开，而且罚的是发布的人——包括我们。
签字逐案决定签字放不开、也挡不住（法条原文）
家事案例写不写能认出涉诉儿童的任何信息
家事客户的评价搬不搬孩子满 18 岁后照样不许发
评价回复说到哪一步法庭禁止发布令下的任何内容
客户授权到哪一步、保密怎么判发了就是我们自己的罪，不看律师签没签
家事案例写不写、客户评价搬不搬、评价回复说到哪一步，本书的做法是逐案定，每一条都要合伙人或董事的书面签字。但签字只解决停笔情形，不把条文明文禁止的东西变成可发布：能认出涉诉儿童的任何信息不发（CYPA s 112），法庭限制发布的家事程序内容不发（FJA s 10），任何签字都解不开。所以每一条家事案例、评价转载或评价回复，送签之前先过我们自己的强制去识别自查（附录 B.4 家事自查表）：庭审细节在这一道就删到只剩法律要点与程序，不留给签字去放；任何一项命中就退回改稿，不送签。律师签字也不替我们担责：CYPA s 112(5)(b) 罚的是「the person who publishes or distributes it」，FJA s 10(5) 罚的是「Any person」——我们发、我们转，被罚的就是我们自己。
| 条文号 | 原文句 | URL | 标签 | 用在哪一节 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FJA 2014 s 10(1) 不公开审理 | 「Subject to subsection (2), all matters and proceedings in a Family Justice Court must be heard in private.」 | FJA ?ProvIds=pr10- | 条文明文；套用到案例页、判例解读页（只写法律要点与程序，不写能对上具体当事人的庭审细节）：保守线，非条文明文（把握度 85%） | 1.7、5.5、5.15 |
| FJA s 10(4)(a)、(5) 禁止发布令与罚则 | (4)：「A Family Justice Court may at any time order that no person is to —(a) publish the name, address or photograph of any witness in any matter or proceeding … or any evidence or any other thing likely to lead to the identification of any such witness;」(5)：「Any person who acts in contravention of any order under subsection (3) or (4) shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $5,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 years or to both.」 | FJA ?ProvIds=pr10- | 条文明文（「Any person」包括代发的我们；签字放不开） | 1.7、5.5、5.15 |
| FJA s 39(1)、(6) 掮客名单与登宪报 | (1)：「The registrar of the Family Justice Courts may publish a list of persons proved to his or her satisfaction, by evidence of general repute or otherwise, to act as touts or unauthorised advisers to suitors or other persons, and may alter and amend the list.」(6)：「A copy of the list must be kept hung up in the Registry of the Family Justice Courts and must be published in the Gazette.」律师不得雇用名单上的人或给其报酬（LPA s 78(1)(e)，见 A.2），经其接案是纪律事由（LPA s 83(2)(f)） | FJA ?ProvIds=pr39- | 条文明文 | 1.7 |
| CYPA 1993 s 112(1)(a)、(1)(c) 不得发布能认出涉诉儿童的信息 | (1)(a)：「a person must not —(a) publish or broadcast any information relating to any proceedings in any court or on appeal from any court that reveals the name, address or school or that includes any particulars that are calculated to lead to the identification of any child or young person concerned in the proceedings, either as being the person against or in respect of whom the proceedings are taken or as being a witness therein;」(1)(c)：孩子满 18 岁后照样不许发（中文转述，原句本轮未摘出）。「child」「young person」的年龄定义在 CYPA s 2，本轮未取 | CYPA ?ProvIds=pr112- | 条文明文（规则本身；签字放不开）；覆盖离婚案里的抚养、探视程序：保守线，非条文明文（把握度 80%，原文是「any proceedings in any court」加「in respect of whom the proceedings are taken」）；年龄定义：未取到原文，按更严的读 | 1.5、1.7、5.5、5.15、B.4 |
| CYPA s 112(5)(b)、(9) 发布者担罪，网站与即时通讯都算 | (5)：「If any information or picture is published or broadcast in contravention of subsection (1) — … (b) in the case of the publication of any information or picture otherwise than as part of a newspaper or periodical publication, the person who publishes or distributes it; … shall jointly be guilty of an offence and shall each be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $5,000 and, in the case of a second or subsequent conviction, to a fine not exceeding $10,000.」(9) 把「publish」定义为包括「(a) the Internet or any website, web service or Internet application; or (b) any messaging system.」 | CYPA ?ProvIds=pr112- | 条文明文（代发方直接进罪状主体：我们发、我们转发，我们就是「the person who publishes or distributes it」；律师签字挡不住） | 0.2、1.1、1.7、5.5、6.1 |
| PCR r 15A(2)(b) 劝和义务 | 原文句见 A.1 | PCR ?ProvIds=pr15A- | 见 A.1 | 1.7 |
A.5 监管方与 SAL 自己怎么做：名录、奖项、专长认证、查册
这一节要你做的：写名录条目、奖项、专长认证和查册锚点之前，来这里核监管方与 SAL 自己的原文——它们自己怎么卖位、怎么颁奖、怎么写认证，就是这几格写法的边界。律师公会的 Featured 名录是书里唯一建议考虑的付费位，但刊例条款没取到，买之前先把条款要来。
| 出处 | 原文句 | URL | 标签 | 用在哪一节 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 律师公会 Find A Featured Lawyer/Law Firm | 「You can find a lawyer or law practice by area. Please note this is not a complete list as the listings are paid by advertising.」页上另指引公众到 LSRA 查完整名单 | lawsociety.org.sg/find-a-featured-lawyer-law-firm/ | 条文明文（监管方自己的做法：按领域陈列、页上写明「paid by advertising」的付费位）；按固定刊例买只陈列、不转介不派单的纯广告位：未取到原文——现行条文未见禁止（核对范围：PCR r 39、GN 6.1.1 第 33–37 段、PD 6.1.2、律师公会 Featured 名录页；核对日：2026-09-29），把握度 70%；书里只建议考虑这一个付费位：保守线，非条文明文（把握度 70%）；这个位含不含转介、派单要看刊例条款，条款没取到：未取到原文（原 /advertise-with-us/ 页 404），买之前先要来 | 6.2 |
| 律师公会 Practice Excellence Awards | 「Award recipients will receive a commemorative plaque and a special Practice Excellence emblem to showcase in marketing materials.」「Nominations for the Practice Excellence Awards are reviewed by an independent selection committee appointed by the Society.」「no fees are chargeable for this year’s nomination process.」「The Nominator, or the number of nominations received, has no effect on a lawyer’s recognition for the purposes of the award(s).」 | lawsociety.org.sg/recognising-our-awardees/（旧址 /the-law-society/lawsocietyawards/ 已跳转到此） | 条文明文（监管方许可把徽标用于营销）；这是颁给个人律师的奖（2025 年首届，设 Family 类别），写在获奖律师本人页，律所页只写「本所某律师获……」：保守线，非条文明文（写法） | 3.2、3.3、6.6 |
| LSRA「Search for a Lawyer or Law Practice」 | 该查询「lists all Singapore solicitors with a current practising certificate from the Supreme Court of Singapore, as well as all foreign lawyers, individuals and law practice entities registered with the LSRA」；「the Ministry of Law does not make any warranty or representation as to their accuracy, completeness or reliability.」 | eservices.mlaw.gov.sg/lsra/search-lawyer-or-law-firm/ | 条文明文（入口与免责句）；个人执业信息的字段名：未取到原文（核实前律师页只写查册链接与核对日，不写编号，也不写成「政府认证」） | 3.2、5.19 |
| SAL Specialist Accreditation 现行页 | 「An Accredited Specialist is a legal practitioner with at least five years’ PQE who has been deemed by SAL to possess the necessary knowledge and skills to handle front-end and/or litigation work of some complexity in a specialised area of law.」「Your accreditation is an individual attainment. It should not be used to promote your firm or organisation.」「If your accreditation is suspended, revoked or cancelled, you cannot hold yourself out as an accredited specialist.」认证领域列出四项：「BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION LAW」「MARITIME AND SHIPPING LAW」「DATA AND DIGITAL ECONOMY LAW」「FAMILY LAW」；开放申请栏：「Senior Accredited Specialist in Family Law」，申请期「1 July 2026 - 31 August 2026」；「Accreditation is valid for three years after which all specialists must apply for reaccreditation.」 | sal.org.sg/learn/specialist-accreditation/（现行版，2026-09-29 读） | 条文明文（SAL 计划规则） | 1.6、3.2 |
| SAL 家事法认证文件 | v1.00（Information for Specialists – Family Law，1 April 2026 起效）3.1：「Both the Accredited Specialist and Senior Accredited Specialist accreditations in Family Law are valid for 3 years as of the date on which the accreditation is conferred.」v1.01 信息指南（2026-05-19）第 5 节时间表：首轮「OLY 2027 Results released」 | sal.org.sg/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/Specialist-Accreditation-Scheme-FAM-Law-Specialists-2026.pdf（v1.00）；sal.org.sg/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Specialist-Accreditation-Scheme-FAM-Law-Info-Guide-2026-v2.pdf（v1.01） | 条文明文 | 1.6、3.2、5.8 |
| SAL Marketing Your Accreditation v7.01（2025-03-21 起效） | 3.1：「Specialists must adhere to the obligations in the relevant legal profession legislation when publicising their practice including, but not limited to, the Legal Profession (Professional Conduct) Rules 2015 rr 43 and 44」。4.1：「Because specialist accreditation is an individual attainment, such accreditation must be identified with the specialist only and not with his or her law firm.」4.2：「the specialist should not authorise, and his or her law firm should refrain from, using phrases such as: “We are an accredited specialist law firm” or a derivative of the same.」4.4：「Specialists must be reaccredited to promote themselves as such and to use the specialist accreditation post-nominals.」4.8：「In communications such as biographies on a specialist’s law firm’s website or events publicity, the words “Accredited Specialist” or “Senior Accredited Specialist” should appear together and in title case … but as “an Accredited Specialist in Building and Construction Law”.」4.5、4.6 只给英文后缀；官方中文译名只在 4.7，且只列建筑、海事、数据与数字经济三类 | sal.org.sg/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Information-Guide-for-Marketing-Accreditation-2025.pdf（现行链接下载件与 2025-10-29 存档逐字节相同） | 条文明文；家事法的后缀与中文译名：未取到原文（指南尚未收录；SAL 发布之前只写全称，不自造缩写、不自译中文） | 1.6、3.2、5.3 |
| SAL 专家名录 | 现行页内「Directory of Specialists」标签：2026-09-29 共 121 条，家事法 0 条（存档里见过的独立地址 …/specialist-accreditation/directory/ 现为 404，以页内标签为准） | sal.org.sg/learn/specialist-accreditation/（页内标签） | 条文明文（事实：截至 2026-09-29，没有任何家事律师能写 Accredited Specialist in Family Law） | 1.6、3.2、5.8、5.19 |
| 律师公会 Ethics Resources Factsheet（2024-07-26 版）第 15–17 段 | 「From 2015 to date, the Advisory Committee has issued more than 100 written guidances to members.」Professional Ethics Digest 2019、2020「are available in the Members’ Library」 | lawsociety.org.sg/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/Law-Society-Ethics-Resources-Factsheet-26-July-2024.pdf | 条文明文（事实陈述） | 0.2、A.6 |
| Chambers、Legal 500、Doyle's、Benchmark、ST × Statista「Best Law Firms」等第三方榜单 | 监管方文件没有专门提到这些榜单、付费奖项或自荐评选（伦理页第 6 类全表已核） | — | 未取到原文（监管方无专门文件）；可引作 r 43(2)(g)「assessment by peers」的专长依据：条文明文；只写自己那一条（发布方、年份、类别、档位）：保守线，非条文明文；不从名次推出「高于某家」「第一」「唯一上榜」：保守线，非条文明文（把握度 80%）；付费即得的奖默认不写：保守线，非条文明文（把握度 70%） | 3.3 |
A.6 条文没禁的几件事、旧规则沿革与没取到的原文
这一节要你做的：主文每一处挂「未取到原文——现行条文未见禁止」的，来第一张表核它核过哪些文件、把握度多少，对客户只说「我们没找到禁止它的条文」；最后一张表列没取到的原文和下次怎么取，开工前先把会员区那一项办了。
条文没禁的几件事
下面十二件事，依据都是「现行条文没有禁止」，不是「条文允许」。按本书的规矩挂「未取到原文」：照本书默认写法写，不作判据；会员区指引或新的执业指引里出现相反的裁定，当季改写（改判条件见 0.2）。
| 这件事与写法条件 | 固定句（核对范围与核对日） | 把握度 | 标签 | 用在哪一节 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 写本所收费区间与「起」：区间 + 计费方式 + 不含项 + 以委托书为准，「起」紧跟界定条件。反向证据是 PD 6.2.1 D 第三句（Council 建议收费细节当面讲，是建议不是禁令，见 A.3） | 现行条文未见禁止（核对范围：PCR 全文〔含第 5 部分 r 37–49、r 17、r 18、r 18A〕、律师公会伦理页第 6 类全部 PD 与 GN、已撤销的 Publicity Rules 全文；核对日：2026-09-29） | 75% | 未取到原文 | 1.2、5.5 |
| 主动请客户留评价：新旧两代规则全文检索「testimonial」「endors」均为 0，伦理页也没有专讲客户评价的文件。四条件（不给好处、不代写、不只挑满意的客户、不指定内容）是保守线，依据 r 44(1)(b) | 现行条文未见禁止（核对范围：现行 PCR 全文、已撤销的 Publicity Rules 全文、律师公会伦理页第 6 类全表；核对日：2026-09-29） | 70% | 未取到原文 | 1.5、6.5 |
| 律所自家页写免费首次咨询：须真免费，写明范围与时长（r 44(2)(b)），不写成促销钩子。这一条只管律所自己的页；我们自己的材料不写我们提供免费法律咨询（s 33(1)(b)，见 A.2）。r 40(1)(c)(i) 与 PD 7.4.3 D.2(d)(i) 只管引荐方宣传「服务免费」 | 现行条文未见禁止（核对范围：PCR 全文、律师公会 12 份 PD 与 2 份 GN；核对日：2026-09-29） | 60% | 未取到原文 | 1.2、5.5 |
| 替律所代发：依据是 r 42(1) 预设了由别人代发的情形，不是 r 41(b)、r 46；每批物料合伙人或董事签认，是我们的执行闸，不是法定形式（保守线） | 现行条文未见禁止（核对范围：PCR 全文；核对日：2026-09-29） | 85% | 未取到原文 | 0.2、6.1 |
| 按固定刊例买纯广告位：只限按领域陈列、读者自选、不转介、不派单、不按结果收费的位置；转介或匹配平台连固定入场费也不付（保守线，80%） | 现行条文未见禁止（核对范围：PCR r 39、GN 6.1.1 第 33–37 段、PD 6.1.2、律师公会 Featured 名录页；核对日：2026-09-29） | 70% | 未取到原文 | 6.2 |
| 我们按固定服务费做代运营，不构成 s 33(3) 的「place at the disposal」：不经手客户分配，不向公众「提供」某位律师的服务；未见判例或指引确认，报价前交法务过一遍 | 现行条文未见禁止（核对范围：LPA s 33 全条；核对日：2026-09-29） | 70% | 未取到原文 | 0.2 |
| 法院规费与本所收费同表、单列一栏：客体是法院，写表名与取值日 | 现行条文未见禁止（核对范围：PCR 全文、律师公会 12 份 PD 与 2 份 GN；核对日：2026-09-29） | 未单列 | 未取到原文 | 1.3、5.4 |
| 律所自家页写一行平台评分：只写「平台 · 条数 · 评分 · 核对日」一行（r 44(2)(c) 可核），这个写法是保守线；不做星级挂件、不做评价聚合页 | 现行条文未见禁止（核对范围：PCR 全文、律师公会 12 份 PD 与 2 份 GN；核对日：2026-09-29） | 未单列 | 未取到原文 | 1.5 |
| robots.txt、防火墙、nosnippet 这类给爬虫的访问设置不算宣传，改它们不走合伙人签字；schema 里写给读者看的字照样按宣传审 | 现行条文未见禁止（核对范围：PCR 2015 全文〔含 r 2(1)「publicity」定义与第 5 部分〕、律师法与相关附属规则、律师公会 12 份 PD 与 2 份 GN；核对日：2026-09-29） | 未单列 | 未取到原文 | 2.4 |
| 参加第三方排名目录的评审、按对方流程提交材料；入选后只写自己那一条（保守线） | 现行条文未见禁止（核对范围：PCR 2015 全文、律师公会 12 份 PD 与 2 份 GN、律师公会伦理页第 6 类全表；核对日：2026-09-29） | 未单列 | 未取到原文 | 3.3、6.3、6.6 |
| 做第二意见与换律师页：主语只许是客户的处境，不评前任律师 | 现行条文未见禁止（核对范围：PCR 2015 全文、律师公会 12 份 PD 与 2 份 GN；核对日：2026-09-29） | 未单列 | 未取到原文 | 4.2、5.11 |
| 做判例摘要页：主语是法院，家事只用法院已公开的匿名判决，另过去识别自查 | 现行条文未见禁止（核对范围：PCR 2015 全文、律师公会 12 份 PD 与 2 份 GN；核对日：2026-09-29） | 未单列 | 未取到原文 | 5.15 |
旧规则沿革
| 条文号 | 原文句 | URL | 标签 | 用在哪一节 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 已撤销的 Legal Profession (Publicity) Rules（R 13，2010 RevEd）r 6 | 旧 r 6 已有与现行 r 43(1)(a)–(c) 同构的三项：专长有据、禁提成功率、禁比收费与质量（中文转述）。2010 RevEd 全文（r 1–12）没有「testimonial」或「endors」字样，现行 PCR 全文同样检索为 0（2026-09-29） | sso.agc.gov.sg/SL-Rev/161-R13/Published/20100531?DocDate=20100531 | 条文明文（沿革事实：新旧两代规则都没有证言禁令；网上营销文章说「新加坡律师广告不得含证言或背书」，新旧原文都找不到出处，不采信） | 1.5 |
| Law Gazette 2012-08「Publicity of Law Practice in Online Forums, Blogs and Other Social Media Platforms」第 7、9 段 | 第 9 段：「if a person initiates a request on the website, online forum or blog (or through any other online platform) to retain the solicitor, he may respond with a private written proposal outside the website, online forum or blog (or through any other online platform) so that persons who did not request the proposal cannot see it.」第 7 段：建议定期复核官网上的一般法律信息是否准确、是否跟上法律变化（中文转述） | v1.lawgazette.com.sg/2012-08/499.htm | 保守线，非条文明文（旧法时期律师公会 Ethics Committee 的指引，援引的是已撤销的 Publicity Rules，现行 PD 未收录） | 5.2、5.9 |
判侧的最强反方意见，与为什么不采纳
本书把律所判在弱监管侧，把握度 75%（0.2）。关键的一读是：r 43(1)(c) 只禁「the fees charged」与「the quality of the services provided」两个维度，对上 → 通用版 0.2 先判你属于哪一侧 第三问「有限制」的定义——「证言能写但有条件，或者只禁一部分比较」。如果把 r 43(1)(c) 读成整条禁比较，律所就落强监管侧。最强的反方意见照录如下：
家事律所应按强监管侧做：①r 43(1)(c) 禁的「收费」和「服务质量」，恰好就是买家想比的全部维度；②家事客户的身份本身是保密信息，案例又同时受 FJA s 10 与 CYPA s 112 管，「证言能写但有条件」在家事里条件几乎永远满足不了；③Council 的「尊严」标准一贯超出条文字面——传单、组屋信箱、放在客户处的宣传册、拍摄镜头里的律所名、TV 价目表都被判不当，网站费用页离价目表只差一步；④拿不准按更严。
不采纳的理由：①② 说的是格子里的写法，本书已经在格子里按强监管侧写了——不比价、不比质量、能认出孩子的信息一律不发，家事案例与评价逐案签字、另过去识别自查。把整站拉到强监管侧，额外改变的只有禁区间价和禁请求评价两件，而这两件原文恰好都没禁，禁掉等于替监管方加规则。③ 有原文可查的尊严判断，全部针对线下派发、当面招揽和电视；对网站，PD 6.2.2 A 明说「It is also permissible for the law practice to display the flyer and/or its contents on the law practice’s website.」，GN 6.1.1 第 31 段明说「A law practice’s website can be used as an advertising tool」。④「拿不准按更严」管的是判不实的情形；四问每个答案都有原文可答，唯一判不实的是收费页的呈现方式，那一格已经按严写（不做价目海报、不写促销腔、写明以委托书为准）。
旧稿冲突的裁定
- 不点名的市场区间：和同行比收费或服务质量是条文明文（r 43(1)(c)）——点名的、能认出是哪一家的、和本所价同表或同段出现的，都在这一档；不点名的市场区间单独一句、旁边没有本所价，是保守线，非条文明文（把握度 85%）（1.3）。
- 律所自家页能不能放平台评分：放不放挂未取到原文（固定句见上表）；只写一行，这个写法是保守线（1.5）。
- 代发的依据：r 42(1) 预设了代发（挂未取到原文，固定句见上表）；不是 r 41(b)，也不是 r 46（理由见 A.1 两行的注）。
- PD 的约束力：律师法 s 71(7)–(9) 加 r 44(1)(c)；不是 r 38(c)(iv)、r 34(1)(f)(iv)。
- 「每处宣传写核准全名」：PD 6.2.2 C 原文只管传单、措辞是 should，推到每一处降为保守线（把握度 85%）；「逐字照核准名」另挂保守线（把握度 75%）。
- 「leading」拆行：PD 6.2.1 D(a) 只说没有专长时自称 leading 属误导，不是一律禁止；默认不写，有第三方榜单同名档位作据才写（保守线，把握度 70%）。No.1、top、best 的依据改为 r 43(1)(c) 加 r 44(2)(c)（保守线，把握度 80%）。
- 「legal associates」读法：受雇律师，不是律师助理；PD 6.2.3 写的是违反「may reasonably be regarded」误导，不是「即属误导」。
- 宪报：s 88(4) 只要求罚款令与训诫登宪报，警告不登。
- SAL 家事法认证：旧稿「认证只有三个领域、家事律师没有可写的认证」已过时——现行页已列 Family Law，今天无人可写（名录家事 0 条，2026-09-29）；首批结果定在 2027 年法律年开幕（OLY 2027）时公布；认证有效期是 3 年。
- 转介平台的固定入场费：GN 6.1.1 第 35 段的「pay a fee」够得着，不付（保守线，把握度 80%）；纯广告位按固定刊例买，把握度由 80% 降到 70%，并加了形态条件（固定句见上表）。
没取到的原文
| 项 | 影响 | 下次怎么取 |
|---|---|---|
| Advisory Committee 100 多份书面指引与 Ethics Digest 2019、2020（会员区，下载链接返回登录页） | 评价、名录、社媒、费用页的个案裁定可能在里面；是判侧把握度的主要余量，出现相反裁定即当季改判 | 第一家律所客户开工前，请客户律所用会员账号导出 |
| Law Gazette 2010-03「Ethics in Practice」 | PD 6.2.1–6.2.3 的出处；PD 已逐字核过，影响小 | 用浏览器取 Law Gazette 旧站同期页 |
| Disciplinary Tribunal 报告摘要 | 宣传、招揽、转介费类违纪的真实处罚尺度 | 按 touting、publicity、referral 检索近五年摘要 |
| ask.gov.sg 上律政部对外国律所宣传的问答 | 外国律所中文页的写法 | 用浏览器取 |
| Professional Conduct Council 依律师法 s 71(6) 发的宣传类 PD | 本轮未找到公开文本；若存在，位阶高于 Council 的 PD（s 71(8)） | 查最高法院或律师公会公告 |
| Family Justice (General) Rules 2024 与家事法庭实务指引 | 庭审文件能披露到多细；收费页上「Hearing fees」那句的条号 | 下轮取 SSO 对应条文与家事法庭的 Practice Directions |
| Women's Charter s 94 | 起诉离婚的婚龄门槛那一条的原句；核之前主文不写年数 | 下轮取 SSO 原句 |
| CYPA s 2「child」「young person」年龄定义 | s 112 覆盖到几岁；核之前按更严的读 | 取 CYPA s 2 |
| CPFTA、PDPA | 底座层；评价回复里的个人资料（PD 6.1.1 已点名 PDPA） | 下轮查 |
律师公会付费名录的刊例条款（原 /advertise-with-us/ 页 404） | 付费名录位含不含转介、派单；买之前必须拿到 | 从 Featured 名录页找刊例入口，或写信问律师公会 |
| Senior Counsel 名单 | 律师页 SC 头衔的核对来源 | 下轮取 |
| LSRA 个人执业信息的字段名 | 核实前律师页只写查册链接与核对日，不写编号 | 用浏览器打开查册结果页，逐字段记下 |
| 伊斯兰法院程序与收费原文、AMLA（Administration of Muslim Law Act） | 伊斯兰婚姻那一套页（5.17）的出处 | 下轮取 |
| SAL 家事法的后缀与官方中文译名 | 家事法专家出现以后，只能写全称 | 2027 年法律年开幕（OLY 2027）后查 SAL 更新的营销指南，回填 1.6、3.2 与本附录 |
| 只有转述、没摘出原句的几条：PD 3.11.2 全文、PD 7.4.3 E 段、LPA s 78(1)(e)、s 30(6)、s 33(7A)、s 83(2)(b)(i)、s 85(1)(b)(c)、CYPA s 112(1)(c)、RI Rules r 11(2)、GN 6.1.1 第 11 与 37 段、PD 6.2.1 C 段、PD 5.2.1 的判例附注、Law Gazette 2012-08 第 7 段 | 主文引到这几处时只写转述，不加引号；PD 3.11.2 补取之前只引文件名 | 下轮逐条补取原句，补进本附录 |
